Attaining the Certified Professional Photographer (CPP) status from the Professional Photographers of America

It’s been twenty years since I was a member of the Professional Photographers of America (PPA). My membership was from about 1995 to about 2005, I believe. I left the group because my main job assignments wasn’t what PPA was all about. Law enforcement and PPA just don’t mix. PPA wasn’t about law enforcement photographers.

When I wasn’t working as a law enforcement photographer, I was working on the side as a wedding and portrait photographer with a bit of theater photography thrown in. But when my primary job took more of my time, I could not plan for non-government photography assignments, it just wasn’t beneficial to me.

Living in Northern Virginia outside of Washington, D.C. has been good to me with a large amount of photography assignments. Since I recently retired with thirty-nine years of government service, it was time for me to start the next chapter of my photography career. I rejoined the PPA and hired a business coach. My first step outside of developing my business is to get my CPP status back and on May 3rd I just did that.

Flyer talking about why hire me as a certified professional photographer (CPP).

Shooting Video

For me it’s a novel experience, shooting video. Even with my day job, we have dedicated people who shoot video more than stills. So, I get little chance or need to take video at one of my government assignments. Well, when I started shooting real estate, that has changed.

My equipment is basic, DJI stabilizer and the iPhone. My post processing software is from my Adobe Creative Cloud suite, Premiere Pro.

I’m not currently videotaping my client, but I’m preparing with mobile audio equipment, just to be ready.

Here'smy first real estate video.

Making mistakes at my age.

You would think that at my age and for how long I’ve been working in photography, I would not make any mistakes.  You're not growing and learning if you don’t make a mistake here and there.  It’s really how you discover those mistakes and how you recover from them.

I was taking a class by National Geographic photographer, Sam Abell way back in the 90s.  It was on photojournalism but really on finding yourself in photography.  Sam is a good inspirational leader in photography and he told me it’s not wrong to go back to a scene, to an idea and keep creating images till you get it right.

Sure, you think that making a mistake or choice that did not work out is a purely amateur move.  But, if you're not taking chances, you're not growing as a photographer or as a professional.  You should always be learning in photography, or else your work will be stale, and not interesting.

I’ve always said, if you find a person who states they never make a mistake, then that person is lying, don’t waste your time and move on.  That person is just hiding behind his or her ego and only doing the same thing, never outside of their comfort zone.

One sign of a professional is that they check their work and get it right before they leave the scene or session.  If you don’t catch it, just fess up, be an adult and redo the photography.  But always remember what you did, so the next time it won’t happen again.   Sometimes you just can’t come back to the scene, and you lost that feeling you found at the photo session.

There are jobs you have to get right the first time: weddings, events dealing with people, crime scenes, autopsies, but especially events that people stage.  Some events you can re-stage, like parts of a wedding, or the run through of a theater play, but you know that ahead of time.

I just did a series of simple portraits of dogs with their handlers for a charity’s calendar.  Most of them came out great, just as I wanted, except the fourth guy and his dog. The autofocus focused on the background and my subjects are just enough out of focus that it has driven me nuts.

So, I get back to my desk and check out my camera. Sure enough, the focus was on single point and not wide field focus points.  The camera was doing its job and focusing on whatever my focus point was pointing to.  Just it wasn’t on my subject, but the background.

I’m currently waiting for a return email from the commanding officer of the K-9 team, hoping he will give me permission to rephotograph that guy with his K-9.  Lucky enough, the officer and his dog are stationed at the entry gate and where we did the photography the next day and I could photograph that team properly.

Another job this week, I was photography a townhouse that’s going on the market.  I decided not to set my aperture at my normal setting but two stops open.  I’m thinking with a 14mm lens I have depth of field.  I was wrong.  A bone head mistake.  I should have known better and I really do.  I mistaken the amount of depth of field I would have with that lens.

The job was a two-story townhouse, which I had to show the open plan of the design.  I increased my ISO and open the aperture to make a quick exposure.  Big mistake.  All the living room and dinning room area have to be rephotographed, no depth of field.

I had mostly blurred furniture and appliances.  The rest of the house is fine. I went to my normal operating aperture for the outdoor venues and continue with that aperture for the upstairs area.  Again, I thought I was being smart, but I didn’t really think the problem through.

Luckily, the realtor is a close friend and will let me reshoot the living room and dining room area after the painters finished.  (Update, I rephotographed the living room area and they look great, f11 at 1 second base exposure for a series of HDRs’.)

Trying new things should not scare you from your photography goals. Take a leap of faith and try something new. Let’s see what develops, but don’t do it on actual professional assignments.

A Professional, A Specialist or Generalist

There are several articles found on the internet that asked how do you know when you are a professional photographer, and should you be a specialist or generalist?

First off, how do you know if you are a professional or not? Are you making a living at it, simply, you are a professional. I’m not saying that makes you good at it, just that you’re making a living at it.   That’s what being a professional means, making a living.

This is a tough idea to decide, but I think it depends on the community that you live in.  Should you be a specialist or generalist?  I think at first, as you are learning your craft and developing your style, take all jobs that come your way.  But, as you develop that ability and your market can bear having a specialist in your town, then become that master of that specialty.

How do you develop that craft and your style?  Should you go to school and get a well-balanced diet of knowledge in your chosen field or just watch YouTube videos?

People on the internet will argue over everything.  They argue that there are options found on the internet: websites, videos, podcasts, and blogs that offer much information on photography and you don’t need to go to formal schooling.

Websites and the internet can teach you how to do some technique or learn about a new piece of equipment, but it doesn’t teach you experience.  That’s what you leave from taking classes and going to photo workshops.  You hear and experience the knowledge from season professional first hand.

Yes, the best feedback is from a live person and not one that will write anything just to be witty.  Know from where these comments are going from, is the person just a beginner or a season professional.

I am a product of both worlds.  I went to university to study photography both here in the United States at a respected photography program and a program in Salzburg, Austria. Of course, this was before the internet and the only place to learn your craft was from taking classes and or the school of hard knocks.  

My first professional job after college was with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). I started at the bottom and had to work my way up the ladder as a photographer.  Working in the photo lab, printing images, and moving into Quality Assurance.  

Of course, I knew nothing about working in a photo lab, just basic tray darkroom processing.  Knew nothing about mass processing and printing of film.  Talk about having to learn on the job.  My field of study at college was photojournalism, animation, and film.

My whole FBI career has been about being slightly trained by the unit that I was in and given just enough to do the job.  I had to research photography by purchasing books and going to photo workshops to learn my craft.

After I moved on from the photo lab, they moved me into the famous Special Photo Unit.  We did all the forensic and scientific photography that included photographing evidence from crime scenes or submitted by local police departments.  An idea job for a law enforcement photographer.  

Now when the Internet started, it exploded with websites and video content from people on a large range of subjects, good and bad.

That’s the problem with just learning on the internet, it’s incomplete and you are not sure if its good information or bad.

Sure, there is feedback on the internet after you post your images to a website.  Sure, you can get lots of feedback about the image, some of which is not helpful or genuine.  Mostly its jealous comments that reflect the ability of the commenter and which they try to make you question your ability or just to make themselves appear talented and important.  They just want to see their names in the comment sections.

Be careful when uploading those images to the web, find a site that you trust and that gives well balance comments about the photography that is being shown.  Another thing, don’t fear the comments, develop a thick skin.  There will always be people that won’t understand and just plan to hate the work that you produce.   You need to find a photographer that will help guide you to achieve the best that you can.

Look at photographers that is working in the field that you want to work in.  Talk to those that actually have experience in the feed that you are trying to work on.  About twenty years ago, I used to belong to the Professional Photographers of America (PPA), and they are mostly wedding and portrait photographers.  

A good photographer friend, Doug Graves, now since retired, wanted me to be a part of that organization.  I photographed weddings for his studio from time to time and I thought it would be a good idea to join. Maybe I can learn something.  

The PPA has certification standards that I was interested in. I wanted to see how I rated on photography and if I met their standards.  One of the requirement was to supply a series of photographs that represent the type of photography that you did.  So I sent in what I could. 

I work in photography for the federal government as a forensic photographer.  I could not use the forensic imagery that I produced for the federal government for the certification, but we also do portraits, groups shots, PR, and scientific images that I could send in place.  The PPA wanted a fair representative of my photography, so I gave it to them.

The comments that I received were supportive, but you could tell, most of my images were outside their experience, specially the scientific images.  One was a high-speed bullet flying through a balloon, with a high-speed light source stopping the action.   

Because of the science of photographing high speed objects, you could not use over one light to stop the action or you would get ghost images of the bullet.  The comments were as if I was photographing a still life and needed multiple light sources.  They didn’t like the hot spot cause by the raw light on the ballon.A Professional, a Specialist or Generalist?

There are several articles found on the internet that asked how do you know when you are a professional photographer, and should you be a specialist or generalist?

First off, how do you know if you are a professional or not? Are you making a living at it, simply, you are a professional. I’m not saying that makes you good at it, just that you’re making a living at it.   That’s what being a professional means, making a living.

Should you be a specialist or generalist?  This is a tough idea to decide, but I think it depends on the community that you live in.   I think at first, as you are learning your craft and developing your style, take all jobs that come your way.  But, as you develop that ability and your market can bear having a specialist in your town, then become that master of that specialty.

How do you develop that craft and style?  Should you go to school and get a well-balanced diet of knowledge in your chosen field or just watch YouTube videos?

People on the internet will argue over everything, and this is one of those things that get asked over and over.  They argue that there are many options found on the internet: websites, videos, podcasts, and blogs that offer as much information on photography and that’s why you don’t need to go to formal schooling.

Websites and the internet can teach you how to a new technique or learn about a new piece of equipment, but it doesn’t teach you experience.  That’s what you learn from taking classes and going to photo workshops.  You hear and experience the knowledge from season professional first hand.

Yes, the best feedback is from a live person and not one that will write comments just to be witty.  Respect and understand where these comments are coming from. Is the person just a beginner or a season professional.

I am a product of both worlds.  I went to university to study photography both here in the United States at a respected photography program and a program in Salzburg, Austria. Of course, this was before the internet and the only place to learn your craft was from taking classes and or the school of hard knocks.  

During college, I got an internship at a local commercial photography studio outside of Pittsburgh, PA.  I learn more about photography there than my first year in college.  My first professional job after college was with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). I started at the bottom and had to work my way up the ladder as a photographer.  Working in the photo lab, printing images, and moving into Quality Assurance, monitoring the film and print processors.  

Of course, I knew nothing about working in a photo lab, just basic tray darkroom processing.  This was a big change for me, since I knew nothing about mass processing and printing of film.  Talk about having to learn on the job.  My field of study at college was photojournalism and animation.  I was basically a generalist.

After I moved on from the photo lab, they moved me into the famous Special Photo Unit.  We did all the forensic and scientific photography that included photographing evidence from crime scenes or submitted by local police departments.  An idea job for a law enforcement photographer.  

My whole FBI career has been about given just enough training to do the job.  I had to research forensic and scientific photography by purchasing books and going to photo workshops to learn my craft. At one point, I had a comprehensive library of photography books.

Now, after the Internet started, it exploded with websites and video content from people on a large range of subjects, good and bad.  You’re not anyone in less you teach on the internet.  They geared every photography website towards teach you something about photography.

That’s the problem with just learning on the internet, it’s incomplete and you are not sure if its good information or bad.

Sure, there is feedback on the internet after you post your images to a website.  Sure, you can get lots of feedback about the image, some of which is not helpful or genuine.  Mostly its jealous comments that reflect the ability of the commenter and which they try to make you question your ability or just to make themselves appear talented and important.  People just want to see their names in the comment sections.

Be careful when uploading those images to the web, find a site that you trust and that gives well balance comments about the photography that is being shown.  Another thing, don’t fear the comments, develop a thick skin.  There will always be people that won’t understand and just plan to hate the work that you produce.   You need to find a photographer that will help guide you to achieve the best that you can.

Look at photographers that is working in the field that you want to work in.  Talk to those that actually have experience in the feed that you are trying to work on.  About twenty years ago, I used to belong to the Professional Photographers of America (PPA), and they are mostly wedding and portrait photographers.  

A good photographer friend, Doug Graves, now since retired, wanted me to be a part of that organization.  I photographed weddings for his studio from time to time and I thought it would be a good idea to join. Maybe I can learn something.  

The PPA has certification standards that I was interested in. I wanted to see how I rated on photography and if I met their standards.  One of the requirement was to supply a series of photographs that represent the type of photography that you did.  So I sent in what I could. 

I work in photography for the federal government as a forensic photographer.  I could not use the forensic imagery that I produced for the federal government for the certification, but we also do portraits, groups shots, PR, and scientific images that I could send in place.  The PPA wanted a fair representative of my photography, so I gave it to them.

The comments that I received were supportive, but you could tell, most of my images were outside their experience, specially the scientific images.  One was a high-speed bullet flying through a balloon, with a high-speed light source stopping the action.   

Because of the science of photographing high speed objects, you could not use more than one light to stop the action or you would get ghost images of the bullet.  The comments were as if I was photographing a still life and needed multiple light sources.  They didn’t like the hot spot cause by the raw light on the balloon.  Be careful where you ask for help or acceptance, it might not be what you need.

 

Event Marketing

My first networking event is under my belt. I took as many photographs as I could of the event, considering the size of the venue. A distillery slash bar called Falls Church Distillery had an indoor and outdoor patio area, but most of the guest was indoors. The scene was dark photographically with large windows that let in the sun, so flash control was important.

The bar area was small, so I kept my gear as small as possible. That limited my choice of going vertical on some pictures, but it was more important to get cleaner and detailed pictures of their faces in the pictures. No one will buy a poorly handle group photo if you can’t make out the subjects.

Overall, I am happy with the images. My flash modifier, the “Kobra” does a great job in spreading the light out for the group. I didn’t have drastic light fall off and a bright hotspot in the middle of the group. I just used an SB-5000 Speedlight with a flash modifier on the top of my Nikon Z7 ii: keep the overall profile to a minimum. A flash bracket would have been nice, but too bulky for that small space.

My workflow is to transfer my images to a Drobo for backup and storage. Imported into Lightroom and make slight adjustments for exposure, contrast, and color. I then uploaded my images to my online gallery, which I have with Zenfolio.

I set my client gallery up with water markings and a price list. I predetermined the internet address before the event. Which I printed out onto small cards with my business information on one side and the gallery link on the other side before the event.

I also had to promote the event with ads stating the internet location of the gallery, which I also included six images from the event. I use a standard 1500 by 1500 pixel format at 300 dpi, as my whiteboard in Photoshop. The last design is first saved as a PSD file format and then as a jpg for uploading to my social media accounts.

NAIOP_Event_20210825.png